Radical Feminism of Facebook: "I am very Sorority"

 

The last 5 years, from the “tetazo”(free the nipple in English), Facebook’s world was not the same again. Under this assumption a guise soup of radical feminism of social networks was cooked that not only became toxic, but it borders on cyberbullying. Do you know what was the worst decision of my life? Reopen Facebook. But it was that he needed to sell and buy something and nowhere does he move as fast as Facebook.

 

And well, look at the feeds, the memes, some shared, one thing led to another and now I spend part of my valuable time every day in that branch of hell. And the worst, I enjoy it a little. Don't judge me, it makes people seem closer than they are. I have always found a fascination with human behavior and Facebook is usually interesting, it gives me memes, I look at people making a fool of myself, and I find out about the odd thing that happens in you. It's amazing what people manage to do behind a screen. The thing is that I started to follow feminism pages, share memes or publications of that nature. follow "activists" and others because I felt identified with my fellow men, in the end we all went through the same problems related to our gender due to patriarchal machismo. (Oh god I'm sounding like one! Nah, it's not true)

 

But I already started to stop liking certain things that I notice. I hate violence. It does not seem to me to be the answer to violence against women. Your message is not going to get more efficiently by raising your voice, burning a church or blowing up lead, you know? And it is not only violence against men, but also against other women who do not adhere to its parallels. There is no sorority, we betray ourselves, we humble ourselves, we segment ourselves. Do you know why I stop identifying myself as a feminist? Because I don't want to be part of anything that separates me from my peers, that confronts them, that forces me to compete intellectually with them, that instead of uniting is a separatist ideology. I do not want that. I want to connect and unite more with them, and recover everything that was denied us for being too busy seeking the comfort of our androcentric social system.

 

But, what am I going to know about feminism?

 

I only know that it emerged after the French revolution, when Olympe de Gouges claimed the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the citizen so that those of women were included. That later the vindication of women's rights was written by Mary Wolfton-algo and that they were imprisoned, Olympia guillotined, and the worst thing was that more than 5 women were prohibited from being together ... for toxic xD. Ah ... this is known as first wave feminism. And what were the sisters looking for? Well, equal education and the right to have an opinion, to choose who to marry and make decisions at home.

(Yes yes, study a little ...)

 

At this point there will be some Neanderthal saying "those are real feminists, not like now, with those if I agree, blah blah blah." Shhh, keep reading carefully, come on! Show that you are the best sperm of the race ... You can! Anyway ... at that moment in history, men used to the privileges they had saw it as something unnatural and with resistance, just as you do now, the socio-cultural contexts are not the same, stop confusing the fat with swelling, fuck it...

Well, where was I? Ah yes, with the second wave. Let me tell you what happened next. You may say, but what does this have to do with what he started talking about? Well then, because as the waves pass, the sea drags trash ... Well, we continue with suffrage. Now, women already want to vote too, and they are starting to organize. It turns out that communism begins to flirt with feminism, because it sells the idea that class inequality also gives rise to gender inequalities, can you imagine? Then the women say, of course! This makes perfect sense! and so all social, gender and race inequalities were welcomed here. All excluded. We continue from the beginning that feminism was by and for white women ... Boom! They weren't that inclusive after all, huh?

 

The stick is that, 4 gringas go to London, to the anti-slavery congress, and they don't let them in because they are women. So, after a drama, they say: ok, send yourselves but behind a curtain so that you don't notice ... The teachers go to the United States all bitched, they make a presentation in front of 300 people, and they propose that with the vote. The other civil rights for women would come in addition ... "But these women did it with demonstrations and pamphlets, without violence or radicalism" ... Shut up.

The British stretched out were more transgressive than the gringas, and the first ones, already crazy (by flying xD), went further with hunger strikes, Molotov bombs, chains on buildings, political sabotage and even fires ... Yes, master, British feminists of the second wave. We are talking about the context of the end of the Second World War, and they already did it in 1918, 80 years after the American women returned from Seneca Falls (where they were put behind the curtain) ... they get only for white women. And this is when everything begins to fragment, because it was only for pretty white bourgeois women, ok, the pretty thing I added (understand sarcasm)

And here the new types of femininisms emerge: Third wave feminism. Black feminists, and communist feminism for example, both talking about double exclusion. The latter would be more radical since they propose a complete change to the system beyond equal rights. Then, with the period between wars, Simone de Beavoiur appears and writes the second sex ... This shit caught fire, the antichrist, the prelude to gender ideology: "You are not born a woman, you become one." This is 1948.

At the end of the second world war with the men at home, the women had all the comforts to be happy housewives, can you imagine? All the advertising of women smiling because they had a new washing machine, or porcelain dishes, which was always dream ah! But instead of being happy, they got depressed, what things? I'm going to tell you why.

 

Because “anthrocentrism” is not only present in the public but also in the private sphere, at home women continued to be the other, that which is not a man without being an individual. Women were dissatisfied with the role they had, they wanted positions in politics, they wanted to have more presence in the media and also be able to work in the same jobs as men, without being dismissed in front of a man or being paid less. This would be what is known as liberal feminism.

But !!!! ... yes, but !, there were feminists who were not only content with wanting equality and being part of the system, they did not settle as they believe that inequalities would continue perpetuating until the system is completely ended established since the beginning of time. This would be the prelude to what is known as radical feminism. As the Communist or Black Women that I mentioned before, there are more, but I do not know them, I am not versed in the subject, I do not know any that also includes gender fluid or non-binary. I have not been there because they scare, and I do not understand much of the subject, please do not kill me! I am afraid of you, feminist friends.

What comes next are the confrontations between radical feminism and liberal feminism. Help ... Yes, because now it is a confrontation between the feminists themselves. I give you an example: If I upload a photo of myself, showing the ass and the tits, for liberal feminism it is very good because you are breaking with the stereotypes of women and with the politically correct rules of conduct, so you are opposing the system, but , for radical feminism you are doing wrong because you move within the desires of men, objectifying yourself as a sexual object for the delight and enjoyment of the phalluses, because women cannot say about their sexuality, and society is “heteronormed”.

I at least have not seen television advertisements of a boy eating a hamburger lewdly for female entertainment, however a girl did. Why? Because straight men are excited by women (and me: v) but not by other minorities (that is, maybe we are more diverse people but we don't know it). However, I am distracted ... under this precept, I have heard feminists who do not recognize transgender women as women and exclude them from the movement. "Oh, but not me!" Do not clarify it “Derpina”, we already know that there are now many micro-feminisms and it is almost as annoying as when a man says: "Not all men hit." Obviously not, it would be difficult to go outside and dodge them all.

Here we already have many layers. About the men who call themselves feminists or "allies" who support the movement and who always question its benefits ... “Diay mae”, it's cool. But I do consider that this is a fight that belongs to my peers and me. And no one can fight our battles, only oneself. Was it the whites who rose up against apartheid? Congruence, and no, it's not that I hate phalluses, haha. Not that she thinks that everyone's penis needs to be cut off and castrated, or that she justifies and approves of women murdering their male partners. Don't get confused, “Derp”.

 

Going back to the big one. It is that literal I have been writing this to the chili for about 5 days and I lose the thread ... The mind of an anxious person does not rest ... Let's see, the context is different, but the methods of struggle remain the same. Because now the fight is to regain control over my body. Decide if I want to be a mother or not and abort, to be able to dress in the way that comes out of my pussy without being sexualized. That you begin to see nudity as normal and not as filthy and that it inspires unwanted or unrequited sexual attitudes for me. I've seen shirtless men with more boobs than me. Lord put on your shirt, I don't know whether to look at her tits or throw up. And why does it cause so much feminism with bare tits smearing shit on the walls? Simple, because they can no longer control our body: "I would not go around with a “wila” who does cam shows that everyone knows about Pan8". I mean, if you did that the devil sucked it, they will never take it seriously nothing more than for a powder and now, it is as if you annul yourself as a sentient person by autonomy, with virtues and defects and you are only a hole to put it in.

Because an empowered woman is a source of shame, a woman who openly experiences her sexuality is unheard of. Because I don't want to deal with other men's comments referring to my girlfriend's body, because it makes me vulnerable, because I don't know how to react, nor how to make them respect her. My masculinity is so fragile that I cannot hold it in front of others. We return to what I was saying about the herd, the man wants to continue being part of it, and faced with the rejection or criticism of his peers they adopt these types of attitudes. For the same reason, to avoid being less men or that their masculinity is questioned, it is that they reject the expression of sexuality of homosexual men, or, they reject trans women. Let's see, it's not that I say you have to like it if or if, it's like food, there are things that just don't like the taste. If it doesn't excite you it doesn't excite you, but I see men making a mental knot wondering if they are homosexual because they are attracted to a girl who has the same genitalia as her.

That said, I will return to the Facebook issue. Let's see, I don't even know what feminists are doing now, but I have seen how they destroy other people through social networks, this is not a protest, this is not changing the world. I hate confrontations and although I can understand that transgressive methods of struggle have been used by feminists throughout history, I cannot not give people a second chance, I still believe in dialogue and the strategy to achieve my goals before violence. Destroying other women, and some men not content with teaching them a lesson. I am a woman, but human.

The bottom line is: Do what I like. If you want to show your body, say, get there, if you know how to deal with the looks, and comments, that's cool, I don't and that's why I don't (at least not in public). But don't underestimate other women who do. On excluded feminisms: It seems very hypocritical to me that a white-skinned mixed-race Latina (who for technical purposes is a white woman with privileges as a white woman, because she is of Latino descent) talks about cultural appropriation because a girl cosplays black character. Mixed-race woman who in turn makes cultural appropriation by painting her face like a woman from an indigenous tribe. Well, I don't know if she was white or if it was just the photo filters, it doesn't matter. This is not blackface, it is fucking cosplay, and stop using those terms to give them a true from hell feminist. Not even structural feminism could alleviate their pain. He is just like a man in a feminist protest. You're welcome.

That's why I like to watch people fall into virtual games like cattle at the slaughterhouse without looking at the blades ahead. Did we forget the Skinner box experiment? Freud's reverse psychology? The cosplayer is not only famous and viral now, but all her cosplays are of dark-skinned characters and she probably finds a way to profit from that right now.

Conclusion?

Do whatever you like to do. If you like to be hanged while you are fucking that does not make you less of a woman, or a bad woman, or that you are betraying the cause, fuck it. I am lazy when feminists get like this, there are many things with which I take communion and others that seem excessive to me. So well, take advantage of the controversy to write this seedy blog.

 

Bye!